Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Surgical Approaches to Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Daniel A. Larson, MD

Southwest Ohio ENT Specialists

Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Part of the Sleep Related Breathing Disorder (SRBD) Continuum.

Epidemiology

  • Prevalence of 4% for women and 9% for men in US, though some studies suggest this is much higher.
    – M:F ratio of 2-3:1 (evens out post-menopause)
    – 80 – 92% is undiagnosed
  • Increased Prevalence with age >65yo

Pathophysiology of OSA

  • Excess external pressure
    a. e.g. In obese pts
  • Anatomic narrowing
    a. Bernoulli effect
  • Decreased rigidity
    a. Lower NM tone

Presentation

Symptoms of OSA

Nocturnal symptoms:

  • Snoring, usually loud, habitual
  • Witnessed apneas, which often interrupt the snoring
  • Nocturia (esp. in peds)
  • Insomnia
  • Restless sleep, with patients often experiencing frequent arousals

Daytime symptoms:

  • Morning headache, dry or sore throat
  • Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) that usually begins during quiet activities
  • Cognitive deficits; memory and intellectual impairment
  • Personality and mood changes, including depression and anxiety
  • Sexual dysfunction, including impotence and decreased libido
  • GERD

Physical Exam

  • Obesity – Body mass index (BMI) greater than 30 kg/m2
  • Large neck circumference – Greater than 43 cm (17 in) in men and 37 cm (15 in) in women
  • Abnormal (increased) Mallampati score
  • Narrowing of the lateral airway walls
    i. independent predictor of the presence of OSA in men but not women
  • Enlarged (ie, “kissing”) tonsils (3+ to 4+)
  • Small mandible

Lateral narrowing

Diagnosis

  • Diagnosis
    1. Home vs. Lab
  • Mild = AHI 5-15
  • Moderate = AHI 15 – 30
  • Severe = AHI > 30

Treatment (peds)

  • T&A
  • Curative in 80% of pts
    1. Less effective in
      • obese pts
      • African American
      • Higher AHI
      • Small tonsils
      • Teens
  • Consider DISE in pts with persistent OSA vs. CPAP

Treatment (adults)

  • Mild OSA
    • Behavioral modification
    • Weight loss
    • positioning
  • Mild to Moderate
    • Option for mandibular advancement splint
  • Mild to Severe
    • CPAP
      • Nasal pillows—> nasal mask—–>full face
    • BiPAP

Failure to tolerate PAP therapy…….

Surgical Candidacy (general)

  • Failure to tolerate CPAP in any severity of OSA
    • Claustrophobia, mask irritation, tubing issues, nasal obstruction
  • Refusal to use CPAP
  • Mild to Moderate OSA with a discrete source of obstruction

Considerations for OSA Surgery

  • In General (historically) Surgery is high morbidity with low return
  • Pt selection is key
  • Set realistic expectations for patients (esp. overweight)
  • Goals of Surgery
    • Adjunct to non-surgical therapy
    • Salvage Therapy for non-surgical failures.

Options

Surgical Decision making

  • Severity of disease
    • AHI and disease burden
  • Patient goals
  • Age
  • Pattern of airway collapse

Role of Nasal Surgery

  • Good option for snoring and UARS patients
  • Typically, will not cure OSA
    • Improve CPAP tolerance
    • As part of multilevel surgery – improved outcomes
    • Improve sleep related Quality of Life
      • Decreases sleep fragmentation, daytime sleepiness

Why improvement with nasal surgery?

Common sequence of obstruction

  • Nasal obstruction
  • Leads to mouth breathing
    • Open mouth posture
  • Tongue falls back
  • Leads to obstruction at the base of tongue

Role of nasal surgery

– Surgical Success rate in nasal surgery group was 68% compared to 55% in no nasal surgery group (P=.002).
– Nasal surgery alone does not significantly affect AHI, ESS.

Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP)

UPPP

Friedman scale for pt selectio

UPPP modifications

Expansion sphincter pharyngoplasty (lateral expansion pharyngoplasty)
– Good for stabilization of the lateralOP wall

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator (HGNS)

HGNS Patient Selection

– AHI 15-65
– BMI <32 kg/m2
– Failure to tolerate CPAP
– <25% central apneas – Age >18
– No source of fixed upper airway obstruction (eg severe ATH, mass, etc.)

Contraindications

– > 25% central apneas
– Concentric collapse of the velopharynx
– Any physical finding that would compromise the performance of UAS
– Any condition that has compromised neurologic control of the UA
– Pt who cannot operate remote w or w/o assistance.
– Pregnant
– Other implants that may interact with UAS
– Pts who require MRI of the chest
– Safe for all other MRIs

STAR trial – outcomes

Future Directions

  • Bilateral HGNS
    • Via transcutaneous stimulation
    • Currently being trialed in Europe

Eastwood, PR et al. Bilateral HGNS in Adults with OSA. European Resp J. 2020


THANK YOU

Daniel Larson
www.soents.comPhone: (937)496-2600

Skip to content